If you’re a fan of Japanese-flavoured, rally-bred, all-paw turbo fun that asks for reasonable money, the latest Subaru WRX STI is your guy. More so than the regular Subaru WRX.

Why? Despite drawing heavily from older powertrain tech, the new STI not only has more weapons in its speed arsenal but its well-proven oily bits feel far more evolved than those – the FA engine, redesigned six-speed – found in the ‘normal’ Rex.

More capacity, proper differentials front and rear, a trickier centre diff, more hard-core handling package and better brakes and grip are just some of the advantages. One seat-of-the-pants sprint up Victorian back country twisties confirms Subaru’s old tech obliterates its new, the STI measurably quicker and more focused.

WRX STI vs Audi S3vs A45 AMG still

As we’ve harped on for some time, Germany has now stolen the small-car, turbo-four, all-wheel-driven march. Specifically Audi, the originator of quattro performance, and Mercedes-Benz, who rocked up virtually yesterday with its manic A45 AMG and raised the bar way up yonder.

But in the absence of a full-monty RS version of Audi’s ‘3’ range best suited to a proper challenge on the trumped-up Merc, the new S3, here in five-door hatch form, is Ingolstadt’s strongest challenger.

WRX STI vs Audi S3 vs A45 AMG driving

It sure wins the stats war. Its 265kW (at 6000rpm) and 450Nm (between 2250-5000rpm) from just 2.0 litres of capacity is astonishing and makes the Audi’s 210kW (at 6500rpm) and 380Nm (from 1800rpm) from the same capacity look a little underdone and the STI’s 221kW (at 6000rpm) and 407Nm (at 4000rpm) from 2.5 litres look positively lazy. And, boy, they’re distinctly different units in character. Doubly so when you throw transmissions into the equation.

Despite its lofty peak-torque point, the larger-capacity STI is all low-to-mid range punch, its urgency flattening off towards its 6700rpm redline. On the go in the lower of the revised six-speed manual’s ratios, response is lively, its tractability urgent.

Subaru WRX STI

And while this would have to be the quickest-shifting and most positively gated STI ’box yet, its ratios aren’t as keenly matched to its engine’s output curves, demanding concentrated gear-rowing to keep the EJ on the boil. Sink the boot in taller gears while cruising and the STI is easily caught snoozing.

Both Germans have excellent dual-clutch gearboxes, with tightly-stacked forward ratios (six for S3, seven for A45), super-fast and super-clean upshifts and completely intuitive shelf-shifting calibrations that never seem to catch the engines off guard.

Unlike the Merc, you can have your S3 as a conventional six-speed manual, but having driven both types back-to-back the DSG is a much quicker device.

Audi S3 vs Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG

The STI’s short-comings quickly become apparent on the strip. Dial up launch control on the S3 and it marches, fuss free, to 100km/h in 4.9sec, hitting 400m in 13.2sec. Again and again, no voodoo or trickery required.

Launching the STI with all the sympathy of an axe murderer gets it off the mark a little quicker, but by 60km/h the S3’s in front, and the Subie manages just 5.6sec to 100 (not helped by needing a shift to third at 90km/h) and is half-a-second behind (13.7sec), with a slower terminal speed (164.0km/h plays 168.6), at the 400m mark.

Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG

From the breath-taking initial shove off the line to the shotgun-like bark on full-throttle upshifts, everything about the AMG suggests exacting precision in getting the task done.

But it’s suddenly the S3 that’s become the comparo’s dark horse and the STI’s biggest threat in getting relegated to last place for sheer pace. Even for rolling acceleration, the STI can merely match the less powerful Audi (both 3.4sec) for 80-120km/h, the Merc a full 0.4sec swifter on the move.

Subaru-WRX STI vs Audi S3

Throwing corners into the equation only amplifies just how different in character these three are. And it becomes much clearer that, while they share commonality in drivetrain layout, each aims to appeal at quite different sets of buyers.

On looks alone – hell, on rear wings alone, though it’s now a deletable option – you might peg the STI as aimed firmly at the youth set, but it’s probably more the case of older buyers young at heart, those to whom Subaru’s rally heritage and traditions speaks the loudest. So do the Si-Drive modes that govern (mostly) the engine’s throttle mapping, as does the ability to manually select front- or rear-drive bias if the driver so chooses.

Then there’s rally-bred mechanical diff package front and rear, techy torque vectoring (complete with a real-time torque read-out in the centre dash display), and good old-fashioned hydraulic steering with a new super-quick rack ratio. The STI, then, wants to engage the driver with its myriad go-faster geekery, encouraging them to play with dials, prod buttons and experiment with settings.

Audi S3

The AMG? Simpler again. Select Sport or Manual from a button on the centre console and aim it for the horizon. Both German cars use essentially front-biased all-wheel-drive systems with a high level of electronic governing, most of it out of the direct control of hands-on driver discretion.

Compared with the Subaru, their handling characters are much more prepackaged from the factory, their calibrations dictated by teams of lab coats rather than the whims of the pilot on the fly.

From the first corner, you notice vast differences in steering. The old-school hydraulic STI steering is urgent and heavily weighted off centre, positively cumbersome at low speed. But dive towards the apex and resistance lightens up, perhaps too much, and the nose suddenly feels airy and distant.

Subaru -WRX STI vs Audi S3 vs Mercedes Benz A45 AMG 2

Manually winding the centre diff to a rear-bias offers a mild, grin-inducing oversteer state under full noise and there’s certainly plenty of oh-so-joyous Subaru balance in the mid corner with a constant throttle.

But up the pace and it’s easily upset by torque shuffling around all four corners of the chassis, the all-paw system feeling much more reactive than proactive when dancing around at the edges of adhesion. Fun? You bet.

But the grip available from the fattest tyres here (245mm) is surprisingly modest. And the Subie is left bucking and shimmying around in corners as either German comes looming up in the rear-view mirror.

The Audi’s heavier Dynamic steering mode doesn’t add much feel. Nor does it need to. The S3 has much more clarity and linearity in its front end and can be more accurately and confidently placed.

Better yet, its quattro system shuffles torque to each wheel where and when it’s needed with more finesse. Less theatrics, more pace. Of the three here it’s certainly the most composed, the easiest to punt hard, and the best car for modest driving skills.

Audi S3 engine

Thing is, the Audi is only really lively on lift-off – it takes lateral weight shifts, rather than a firm throttle prod, to get that tail moving. A more rearward torque bias and a fatter rubber footprint would inject the S3 with some welcome fun factor.

The AMG is the tightest, tautest and edgiest car of the three. And ‘edgiest’ doesn’t mean edge of disaster either. In fact, quite the opposite. The steering is crisper and offers a tad more precision than the Audi, its front end immensely grippy.

And it takes extreme foolhardiness to get the thing to understeer; few other cars out there with 235mm tyres – whatever the driven wheels – point with such precision.

That hunkered-down feeling of tightness continues to the mid-corner and corner exit. It feels the most agile in direction changes and the most willing to adjust its line.

Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG driving

The A45’s are so robust, powerful and brimming with feel that you can dive much deeper into corners, regardless of camber or surface. The Audi’s stoppers are very handy too, and both Germans seem to sit flatter when turning in under brakes.

Braking from 100km/h to rest in torrential rain, the STI’s four-pot fronts gave it the slight edge over the single-piston Audi, stopping in 39.6m versus the S3’s 40.6m. As for the Merc, it appeared to ignore the wet, its huge four-piston front jobbies bringing the A45 to a halt in just 35.5m. Add easily the most sport focused seats of the three and one verdict is clear: if going fast is your game and money is no object, the A45 is the tool for the job. Easily.

WRX STI vs Audi S3 vs A45 AMG driving straight

The AMG isn’t hard to live with, but the S3 strikes a superior balance between comfortable normal driving manners and on-command rocketship ability. And while the AMG is the acceleration king, the S3 isn’t left behind by much. There’s fair argument the AMG is worth its lofty price-tag, but there’s an equal one that the S3 is something of a bargain.

Despite its sharp new price, the STI can’t quite convert its $10K benefit into superior all-round value. Inside, the Audi is two rungs above the Subaru in every way: beautiful heated electric seats versus cheaper mechanical pews; premium infotainment/sat-nav with dial centre-console interface versus clunky ’00s-esque touchscreen arrangement; real alloy versus fake plastic… the list goes on.

Subaru WRX STI vs Audi S3 vs Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG still

It mightn’t scream heroics like its rivals, but the S3 is a bloody hard car to fault. And the car this judge grabbed the keys to when the dust settled. Nice job Audi.

u00a0Mercedes-benz A45 AMGu00a0Subaru WRX STIu00a0Audi S3
u00a04 out of 5 starsu00a04 out of 5 starsu00a04 out of 5 stars
Body5-door, 5-seat hatchu00a04-door, 5-seat sedanu00a05-door, 5-seat hatch
Driveall-wheelu00a0all-wheelu00a0all-wheel
Engine1991cc inline-4, DOHC, 16v, turbou00a02457cc flat-4, DOHC, 16v, turbou00a01984cc inline-4, DOHC, 16v, turbo
Bore/stroke83.0 x 92.0mmu00a099.5 x 79mmu00a082.5 x 92.8mm
Compression8.6:1u00a08.2:1u00a09.3:1
Power265kW @ 6000rpmu00a0221kW @ 6000rpmu00a0206kW @ 5100-6500rpm
Torque450Nm @ 2250-5000rpmu00a0407Nm @ 4000rpmu00a0380Nm @ 1800-5100rpm
Power/weight179kW/tonneu00a0145kW/tonneu00a0143kW/tonne
Consumption12.8L/100km (tested)u00a013.0L/100km (tested)u00a010.2L/100km (tested)
CO2 emissions304g/km (tested)u00a0309g/km (tested)u00a0243g/km (tested)
Transmission7-speed dual-clutchu00a06-speed manualu00a06-speed dual-clutch
Weight1480kgu00a01525kgu00a01445kg
Suspensionstruts, coil springs, anti-roll bar (f); multi-links, coil springs, anti-roll bar (r)u00a0A-arms, struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar (f) multi-link, coil springs, anti-roll bar (r)u00a0A-arms, struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar (f); multi-links, coil springs, anti-roll bar (r)
L/W/H4359/1780/1417mmu00a04595/1796/1476mmu00a04324/1785/1404mm
Wheelbase2699mmu00a02649mmu00a02631mm
Tracks1557/1561mm (f/r)u00a01529/1539mm (f/r)u00a01535/1511mm (f/r)
Steeringelectrically-assisted rack and pinionu00a0hydraulically-assisted rack and pinionu00a0electrically-assisted rack and pinion
Brakes350mm ventilated/drilled discs, 4-piston calipers (f); 330mm ventilated/drilled discs, single-piston calipers (r)330mm ventilated discs, 4-piston calipers (f); 315mm ventilated discs, 2-piston calipers (r)u00a0340mm ventilated discs, single-piston calipers (f); 310mm ventilated discs, single-piston calipers (r)
Wheels19 x 8.0-inch (f/r)u00a018 x 8.5-inch (f/r)u00a018 x 7.5-inch (f/r)
Tyres235/35 ZR19 97Y Dunlop Sport Maxx (f/r)u00a0225/40 R18 97W Dunlop Sport Maxx (f/r)u00a0225/40 R18 92Y Continental ContiSportContact5 (f/r)
Price$74,990u00a0$49,990u00a0$59,900
Price as Tested$74,990u00a0$49,990u00a0$62,350* Metallic paint $1050; 5 twin-spoke wheel design $500; Audi Design Select red trim $900u00a0
PositivesIncredible performance, brilliant chassis, awesome brakesu00a0Handling balance and adjustability; sharp new priceu00a0Cracking drivetrain; brilliant interior; the everyday choiceu00a0
NegativesPricey, lacks some everyday comfort, thirstyu00a0No quicker than the last car; doesnu2019t move the game forwardu00a0Conservative looks; needs a bit more fun factor