Strictly speaking the Mazda CX-5 isn’t a ‘newcomer,’ but the force-fed petrol engine that’s just been transplanted into its snout is definitely a fresh addition to Mazda’s likeable mid-sizer. Displacing 2.5 litres and augmented by a turbocharger, it’s lifted almost wholesale from its bigger CX-9 sibling and gets us a little bit excited. After all, the formula of adding a big engine to a small car is one that’s delivered great results in the past, although this time it’s not power-to-weight that’s the attractive proposition, but a great deal more low-down tractability and everyday driveability than the carry-over atmo petrols that sit beside it in the CX-5 range.
The Escape ST-Line, meanwhile, is a familiar face. Also rocking turbo power and all-paw under-bits, the Escape is a Wheels favourite by virtue of its agility, value and stout straight-line performance. However, with the CX-5 now flexing more torque, is the Ford’s dynamic edge enough to keep it relevant?
Equipment and value
It’s a pricey thing, but the Mazda comes packed out with a 360-degree parking camera display, powered tailgate, head-up display, sat-nav, Apple Carplay/Android Auto, appealing leather upholstery and, of course, one of the biggest petrol engines in its class. Safety aids comprise AEB (which works at speeds between 4km/h to 80km/h as well as in reverse), lane-departure warning and blind-spot monitoring.
In the blue corner, the Escape ST-Line mirrors most of the Mazda’s equipment list when specced up with the optional $800 Tech Pack, meaning major differences aren’t many and mostly boil down to the absence of a HUD. The kicker? the Escape ST-Line is a sub-$40K offering, while Mazda asks $49K for the CX-5 Akera, given its flagship status. Even though the Ford needs to drink pricey premium unleaded and the Mazda will happily slurp 91-octane, the Ford’s value proposition is simply sharper, thus handing it the win for this round.
Space and comfort
Hop between the two and you’ll instantly note that the CX-5, which launched in second-gen form in 2017, is a full generation ahead of the 2012-vintage Escape. The interior of the Mazda is more sophisticated, cohesive and ergonomically sound than the plasticky, dated Ford. Accessing the ventilation controls on the Escape’s lower dash is hampered by that high-set gear shifter, and the dash vents simply serve to freeze your fingers rather than cool your face. The Mazda’s driving position also feels more car-like and natural, but some may prefer the upright, more commanding SUV-like posture you need to pilot the Escape comfortably.
When it comes to seats, though, the ST-Line’s deeper bolsters and microsuede panels feel better beneath your bum and behind your back. Then again, the Mazda’s larger and more practical 442L boot capacity (versus 406L) tips the balance toward the CX-5 here.
How they drive
There’s a hot-hatchy feel to the way the Escape ST-Line connects your fingertips to the front wheels. It’s decisive and fast-reacting, but with just enough on-centre relaxedness to not feel fidgety on straight highways. Intriguingly, though, it layers commendable ride comfort on top of that dynamic aptitude – a true achievement given its sports-oriented damper settings, 10mm lower springs and low-profile Continentals. And though it may lack torque relative to the Mazda’s grunty 2.5 turbo, the Escape’s engine feels more lively and willing to spin, with a six-speed auto that executes intelligent shifts.
The Mazda has muscle, no doubt about it, but a sensitive ride over low-amplitude bumps and a transmission that seems a tad too willing to kick down a gear don’t gel with the engine’s relaxed yet strong low-end torque delivery. A re-tune would cure those ailments, no doubt, but right now it’s the Ford that boasts the edge out on the street.
Shoehorning the 2.5-litre turbo into the CX-5 has resulted in the best mid-sized Mazda SUV to date, but the cost disparity between it and the similarly specced Escape ST-Line is hard to justify if things like cabin design are secondary considerations for you. The Escape feels just as quick and actually rides better than the Mazda, which cements the outcome. Value and dynamics give Ford the win.
How are you finding our new site design? Tell us in the comments below or send us your thoughts at email@example.com.
Get your monthly fix of news, reviews and stories on the greatest cars and minds in the automotive world.
2021 Dual-cab ute megatest: Performance and braking comparison
We test the acceleration and braking performance of 11 dual-cab 4x4 utes available in Australia from Mitsubishi, Toyota, Ford, Nissan, Isuzu, Jeep, Mazda, Ssangyong and GWM
2021 Dual-cab ute megatest: Results and summary
With on-road, off-road, performance and tow testing done, we score the top 11 dual-cab utes in Australia
Lifestyle utes compared: 2021 HiLux Rugged X vs Ranger Raptor vs Gladiator Rubicon vs BT-50 Thunder
The 2021 Wheels and 4x4 Australia dual-cab ute megatest series continues with a comparison of the 2021 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon, Ford Ranger Raptor, Mazda BT-50 Thunder and Toyota HiLux Rugged X to find the best lifestyle ute