Powered by
  • WheelsWheels
  • 4X4 Australia4X4 Australia
  • Street MachineStreet Machine
  • Trade Unique CarsTrade Unique Cars

HSV GTS vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs Lexus GS F

By Scott Newman | Photos Ellen Dewar, 28 Aug 2016 Reviews

HSV GTS vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs Lexus GS F

The new Lexus GS F has wandered into the V8 super sedan den, where it’s keen to run rings around a couple of hungry force-fed predators

It used to be simple.

In your traditional triple-header V8 comparison you’d have three large four-door sedans, heralding from either Australia or the Fatherland, each with a fuel-guzzling lump in the front feeding tyre-frying torque to the rear wheels. There’d be a manual if it was designed for keen drivers, or a torque converter slushbox if it had luxo leanings.

Things are very different in 2016. In today’s topsy-turvy world we have three different engine configurations (one of which claims to sip just 8.6L/100km), three different transmissions and two different body sizes. And the only contender that conforms to the traditional automatic gearbox, naturally-aspirated V8 stereotype is Japanese!

And it’s the Lexus GS F that’s the catalyst for this comparison. It impressed us at its local launch, but its pricing and performance leaves it in a bit of a no man’s land in terms of rivals. As a full-size V8 sedan its obvious competitors are the BMW M5 and Mercedes-AMG E63, but its price ($148,800) and performance (351kW/530Nm; 0-100km/h 4.6sec) neatly align with models the next rung down.

HSV GTS vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S vs Lexus GS-F rearAs such, we’ve decided to attack the Lexus from both sides to try and gain a clearer picture of where this bent-eight Bento box sits in the muscle car landscape. The HSV GTS is about as good as full-size performance gets without spending crazy money (and even then it’s pretty competitive) while Mercedes-AMG’s latest C63 is the current benchmark if you’re looking to spend around $150,000 on a sports sedan.

Key to the C63’s appeal is the 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 under its heavily ridged bonnet. Producing 375kW/700Nm, it’s not so much an engine as a volcanic eruption, capable of turning the 265mm rear Michelin Pilot Super Sports into molten black lava at will. AMG’s Race Start launch control program is an easy way to reel off 4.4-4.5sec 0-100km/h times, but the furious struggle it sets off between electronics and wheelspin feels like The Hulk is trying to escape from the C63’s conservative Bruce Banner exterior.

Walking the car off the line oh-so-gently – not as easy as it sounds thanks to the wet-clutch auto’s hesitancy from a standstill – and feeding the power in smoothly proves more successful. There’s a fair amount of axle tramp in first gear, but drive through it and the C63 slithers its way to 100km/h in 4.16sec before storming across the quarter mile mark in 12.23sec at 192.50km/h.

HSV-GTS-vs -Mercedes -AMG-C63-S-vs -Lexus -GS-FdrivingAs much as we loved the old M156 atmo 6.2, this new force-fed M178 clearly moves the game on. With the turbos wedged inside the vee of the engine, boost builds quickly and that massive 700Nm torque peak gives the car insane levels of roll-on performance, 80-120km/h disappearing in just 2.2sec. Clearly no-one told AMG that turbos ruin a car’s soundtrack, either, the 4.0-litre V8’s deep gurgle morphing into a fierce growl as revs build.

If anything, though, HSV’s 6.2-litre supercharged V8 sounds even better. The choof as the exhaust valves open is pretty naff, but it’s a dirty noise, full of aggression and pent-up rage. What exactly it’s angry about is unclear, because this manual GTS is the fastest standard Aussie car we’ve ever tested. After a number of 4.4sec 0-100km/h runs, a fluke of a launch and a crisp change into second nets 0-100km/h in 4.31sec and a 12.37sec quarter mile at 188.32km/h.

HSV’s range-topper hasn’t always felt its full 430kW, but with 7000 hard press kilometres under its Continentals, GTS-430 is a rocketship, hauling through the gears with ferocious enthusiasm. The Gen-F2 GTS is supposedly unchanged mechanically, but the gearbox in this car (and every other Gen-F2 or VF II product we try) feels particularly slick; quick changes are far less of a lottery now and, all other things being equal, saving a tenth or two on each shift would certainly explain the improvement in acceleration times.

HSV-GTS-vs -Mercedes -AMG-C63-S-vs -Lexus -GS-Fdriving -frontUnfortunately for the Lexus, it’s a distant third in such potent company. Lexus claims a competitive 4.6sec 0-100km/h time, but short of pulling all the panels off to drop a couple of hundred kilograms it’s never going to do that. The fastest figures of 4.99sec and 13.09sec for the 0-100km/h and 0-400m respectively are achieved by simply mashing the throttle from rest with all the electronics off, but to focus purely on the numbers sells the GS F short. Which is just as well, as it trails the C63 to 180km/h by a whopping 2.34sec.

The 5.0-litre V8 is a great engine, spinning easily to its 7300rpm cutout with a note that, while obviously synthetically enhanced, is a curiously pleasing mixture of smooth and raucous, like velvet sandpaper. Selecting Sport mode is a must, as Normal has the eight-speed auto clamouring for a higher gear and anaesthetises the throttle into the bargain.

The engine/gearbox combo is an effective one. The auto’s around town behaviour shames even the best dual-clutch, yet the shifts are quick and the eight tightly-stacked ratios make the most of the GS F’s relatively limited torque reserves. That may sound like an odd description for a 5.0-litre V8, but 530Nm (at a relatively high 4800rpm) just isn’t enough to trouble 275mm rear Michelin Pilot Super Sports.

HSV-GTS-vs -Mercedes -AMG-C63-S-vs -Lexus -GS-Fdriving -rearIt’s unusual for a car like this to have more grip than grunt, but the result is you can drive the absolute ring off the GS F. The brakes are outstanding, the passive suspension provides excellent body control and with total confidence in the rear end it’s simply a matter of waiting for the front to stick – there is a degree of push at the limit – and then flooring the throttle.

The electrically-assisted steering isn’t particularly fast, nor does it provide a whole lot of feel or feedback, but the weighting is about right and it feels nicely in tune with the rest of the car’s responses.

Despite being massively more powerful, the HSV feels equally all-of-a-piece. It’s too big to really shrink around you on a tight, twisty road, but the car’s inherent balance makes it a very friendly beast. Selecting ‘Performance’ on the Driver Preference Dial adds extra weight to the steering – though a little more response off-centre would be welcome – and firms the magnetorheological dampers, but the greatest strengths of the GTS are its brakes and ESP calibration.

HSV-GTS-rearFor outright power, pedal feel and stamina, the HSV’s monster AP Racing stoppers are absolutely world-class. Likewise, the way the ESP system will let the car move around – it’ll allow a half-turn of opposite lock in certain situations – while subtly reining in any exuberance is on par with any other manufacturer. It allows you to drive hard with huge confidence without feeling like the car is doing everything for you.

The C63’s ESP isn’t quite as lenient, but then its potency is such that a tighter hold on the reins probably isn’t a bad idea. Traditionally, AMG’s sedans have been comfy grand tourers, but the first C63 took a big step in a sportier direction and the latest model has taken another stride again.

Handling response is now prioritised over ride comfort and with the chassis in its Sport mode the car feels taut and reactive. It skitters over small amplitude bumps and with less weight and stiffer suspension than the other two, body roll feels to be minimal. Reverting to Comfort increases compliance and gives the chassis a little more ‘feel’, but thankfully the ability to mix ’n’ match settings means the softer suspension can be teamed with the most aggressive engine map.

Mercedes -driving -frontThe steering is weighty and requires a decent nudge to move off centre, but it’s only when you switch back from the relatively mute Lexus that you realise the C63 has been feeding back a steady stream of information from the front axle. Once the Michelins have some heat in them, grip levels are high, but it quickly becomes clear that the best way to extract speed from the C63 is to maximise the effectiveness of the force of nature under the bonnet.

This means leaning hard on the awesome carbon-ceramic front brakes (a hefty $9900 option), rotating the car quickly mid-corner and then exiting as straight as possible to make the most of the available traction. It’s a different technique to the balls-out commitment allowed by the Lexus, but devastatingly effective.

With Sports ESP engaged the electronics will only step in if you’ve really made a hash of things, and it’s handy to have the safety net in place as while traction is strong once the tyres are up to temperature, with what feels like about 10,000Nm on tap it only takes a poorly timed bump, camber or patch of dirt to have the rear squirming. The transition to slip can be quite abrupt, too, a characteristic shared by virtually every car we drive on Michelin Pilot Super Sports.

HSV-GTS-vs -Mercedes -AMG-C63-S-vs -Lexus -GS-Fdriving -aerialThey’re also relatively noisy on Australia’s coarse chip rural roads, which combined with the firm ride – even in Comfort the C63 refuses to completely relax – will give those expecting traditional Mercedes levels of pliancy and refinement a wake-up call. Some find it a step too far, personally I think it’s just on the right side of acceptable.

It’s a trait shared by the Lexus, though the GS F’s passive suspension setup can be quite abrupt at urban speeds. On the highway it’s still firm – your passengers are going to know you bought a sporty car – but not necessarily uncomfortably so. It’s roughly comparable to the Sport setting in the HSV, which just goes to show the value of adaptive dampers, as a twist of the Driver Preference Dial selects ‘Tour’ for the GTS’s clever suspension.

For outright comfort the HSV is the best here, absorbing all manner of road imperfections. Tour mode softens the dampers so much that the rear will actually bottom out over speed bumps, but on country roads it allows the GTS to lope along serenely, the steering also lightening to require less effort. Where the Australian loses points is low-speed refinement.

Hsv -gts -engineThere’s some heavy-duty engineering underneath the GTS and you can hear it with clunksand groans from the clutch, gearbox and diff around town. It’s not something that would be tolerated by either of the premium manufacturers, though AMG’s MCT wet-clutch auto isn’t above a few low-speed stumbles.

The greatest difference between these three can be found in the interiors. All three are up against it to varying degrees by being the range-topping variants and therefore sharing interior architecture with much cheaper models, but it’s in the HSV that this is most evident. Seats aside, there’s little to differentiate a $95K GTS from a $54K SS-V Redline, but then there’s not a lot to complain about either. The driving position is excellent, there’s plenty of equipment and masses of space front and rear for big, burly Aussie blokes.

Those same blokes would struggle in the back of the C63. Legroom is reasonable but the seat cushion is very short and simple physics denies it the head and shoulder room of its full-size rivals. Fine for kids, a squeeze for larger adults. Up front there’s plenty of alcantara, red-stitched leather and shiny chrome, though the ‘blood carbon’ effect on the centre console of our ‘Edition 1’ test car (see breakout) is an acquired taste. Only the odd hard plastic surface is a reminder the C63 shares its roots with a $60,000 C200.

Merc -interiorThe Lexus is the most convincing in terms of material quality and also carries the most equipment, but sadly you’re more likely to be cursing the GS F’s clunky, unintuitive infotainment controller than admiring its fit and finish. The mouse-like touch pad requires significant attention to complete the simplest of tasks, attention that would be better served on the road ahead. It’s a shame, as it takes the gloss off what is a nice place to be.

Which kind of sums up the GS F; it’s a really good car, without quite nailing that final few per cent. It has a great engine, awesome brakes, handles well and is loaded with kit. At around $150,000 it deserves to be successful, and not just as a left-field choice. Unfortunately for Lexus, the GS F is a very good car in the company of two outstanding ones.

If value for money took precedence, the HSV GTS would be an easy winner – how could it not? It’s unbelievably fast, the roomiest and most comfortable car here and more than holds its own on a twisty road, all for 60 per cent the cost of the others. It’s a phenomenal achievement for a small Aussie company, and it’s difficult to countenance that the GTS will cease to exist in a little over 12 months’ time. It has a huge appetite for fuel and tyres and has a couple of rough edges compared to other $100K rivals, but it’s undoubtedly the best performance car Australia has ever produced.

Merc -winnerBut in terms of outright performance, the Mercedes-AMG C63 is our winner. At $172,310 as-tested, it’s huge money, but in return provides supercar levels of performance and dynamics in a practical four-door sedan. It’s a high-tech hot rod, a muscle car for the new millennium and, for the time being at least, the best V8 sedan you can buy. It’s that simple.


Body 4-door, 5-seat sedan 4-door, 5-seat sedan 4-door, 5-seat sedan
Drive rear wheel rear wheel rear wheel
Engine 6162cc V8, OHV, 16v, supercharger 3982cc V8, DOHC, 32v, twin-turbo 4969cc V8, DOHC, 32v
Bore/stroke 103.1 x 92.0mm 83.0 x 92.0mm 94.0 x 89.5mm
Compression 9.1:1 10.5:1 12.3:1
Power 430kW @ 6150rpm 375kW @ 5500-6250rpm 351kW @ 7100rpm
Torque 740Nm @ 3850rpm 700Nm @ 1750-4500rpm 530Nm @ 4800-5600rpm
Power/weight 234kW/tonne 227kW/tonne 188kW/tonne
Transmission 6-speed manual 7-speed wet-clutch automatic 8-speed automatic
Weight 1841kg 1655kg 1865kg
L/W/H 4988/1899/1457mm 4756/1839/1426mm 4915/1845/1440mm
Tracks 1616/1590mm (f/r) 1609/1546mm (f/r) 1555/1560mm (f/r)
Steering electrically-assisted rack-and-pinion electrically-assisted rack-and-pinion electrically-assisted rack-and-pinion
Brakes(F) 390mm ventilated/drilled discs, 6-piston calipers 402mm ventilated/drilled carbon-ceramic discs, 6-piston calipers 380mm ventilated/drilled discs, 6-piston calipers
Brakes(R) 372mm ventilated/drilled discs, 4-piston calipers 360mm ventilated/drilled discs, 4-piston calipers 345mm ventilated/drilled discs, 4-piston calipers
Wheels 20.0 x 8.5-inch, 20.0 x 9.5-inch (f/r) 19.0 x 8.5-inch,  19.0 x 9.5-inch (f/r) 19.0 x 8.5-inch (f/r); 19.0 x 9.5-inch
Tyre sizes 255/35 ZR20 (f); 275/35 ZR20(r) 245/35 ZR19 (f); 265/35 ZR19 (r) 255/35 ZR19 (f); 275/35 ZR19 (r)
Tyre Continental ContiSportContact Michelin Pilot Super Sport Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Price as tested $95,590 $172,310 $151,700
Pros Incredible value; hugely fast; practical Crazy power; great handling; brilliant brakes Great drivetrain; chassis balance; sharp pricing
Cons Outrageous thirst; low-speed refinement Traction issues; firm ride; very expensive Rivals much faster; abrupt ride; divisive looks
Star Rating 4.5/5 4.5/5 4/5